Firm Update No. 2022-07本所动态 2022-07 号
In re Two Queens Divorces: Correcting a Misspelled Name in the Judgment and Curing a Defective Affidavit of Service皇后区两宗离婚案：更正判决中的姓名拼写错误及补正送达誓章瑕疵
- Practice领域
- Family Law家庭婚姻法
- Jurisdiction管辖
- Supreme Court, Queens County纽约州最高法院皇后区分院
- Our role本所角色
- Counsel to the plaintiffs原告律师
- Status进展
- Judgments entered and corrected, 2021 to 20222021年至2022年判决登录及更正
IFacts事实
In the first case, the Judgment of Divorce was entered in October 2021 with the defendant's surname misspelled. The firm moved to correct it; the court advised that no motion was needed and directed submission of an amended judgment, which was entered in January 2022. In the second, the clerk flagged in June 2022 that the affidavit of service bore a date earlier than the filing of the summons and that an identifier on the papers was incorrect. The firm filed a corrected affidavit of service in July 2022.第一宗案件的离婚判决于2021年10月登录，但被告姓氏拼写有误。本所申请更正；法院表示无需动议，指示提交修订后的判决，该判决于2022年1月登录。第二宗案件中，书记官于2022年6月指出送达誓章所载日期早于传票提交日期，且文件上一项身份信息有误。本所于2022年7月提交更正后的送达誓章。
IIQuestion Presented争议问题
How are clerical errors in a judgment and defects in proof of service corrected without starting a divorce over?判决中的文书错误及送达证明的瑕疵，如何在不重新起诉的情况下更正？
IIIRelevant Law相关法律
CPLR 304(a): commencement by filing; summons with notice; filing systemCPLR 304(a)：以立案方式启动诉讼；附通知传票；立案制度
CPLR 2001: disregard of defects; nonprejudicial irregularity; substantial rightCPLR 2001：忽略程序瑕疵；无损害的不规范；实质权利
CPLR 5019(a): correction of judgment; clerical mistake; irregularity not affecting a substantial rightCPLR 5019(a)：判决更正；笔误；不影响实质权利的瑕疵
IVDisposition结果
The amended Judgment of Divorce in the first case was entered on January 6, 2022, and the Judgment of Divorce in the second case was entered on July 19, 2022, after the corrected affidavit of service was filed.第一宗案件的修订离婚判决于2022年1月6日登录；第二宗案件在提交更正后的送达誓章后，离婚判决于2022年7月19日登录。
Client details are withheld to protect confidentiality. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.为保护客户隐私，相关信息已隐去。过往结果不保证类似案件的结果。