Firm Update No. 2024-07本所动态 2024-07 号
In re Matrimonial Action Resolved by Stipulation: Custody to the Father and Child Support Under the CSSA以和解协议解决的离婚诉讼：子女由父亲监护，子女抚养费依《子女抚养标准法》确定
- Practice领域
- Family Law家庭婚姻法
- Jurisdiction管辖
- Supreme Court, Queens County纽约州最高法院皇后区分院
- Our role本所角色
- Counsel to the plaintiff原告律师
- Status进展
- Judgment of Divorce entered Oct. 17, 2024离婚判决于2024年10月17日登录
IFacts事实
The parties, parents of two children, were divorcing in Supreme Court, Queens County. The firm represented the father. The parties resolved custody and support by agreement: the father, who also had the higher income, would be the custodial parent of both children, and the mother would pay child support. In April 2024 the court declined to accept an amended settlement because it did not set forth how the agreed child support had been computed and did not otherwise comply with the Child Support Standards Act. In August 2024 the firm submitted a further amended stipulation, findings of fact and proposed judgment, together with the guideline calculation.双方育有两名子女，在纽约州最高法院皇后区分院进行离婚诉讼。本所代理父亲。双方就监护与抚养达成协议：收入较高的父亲作为两名子女的监护方，母亲支付子女抚养费。2024年4月，法院以修订协议未说明约定抚养费的计算方式、且在其他方面亦不符合《子女抚养标准法》为由，未予接受。2024年8月，本所提交了再次修订的和解协议、事实认定及判决草案，并附上按标准计算的明细。
IIQuestion Presented争议问题
What must a stipulation of settlement recite before a court will incorporate its child support terms into a judgment of divorce?和解协议须载明哪些内容，法院才会将其中的子女抚养条款纳入离婚判决？
IIIRelevant Law相关法律
N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 240(1-b)(h): Child Support Standards Act; mandatory recitals; presumptively correct amount; deviation; nonwaivable requirementN.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 240(1-b)(h)：子女抚养费标准法；强制性陈述条款；推定正确数额；偏离标准；不可放弃之要求
Cimons v. Cimons, 53 A.D.3d 125 (2d Dep't 2008): noncompliant stipulation; vacatur; related provisions; basic child support obligationCimons v. Cimons, 53 A.D.3d 125 (2d Dep't 2008)：不合规协议；撤销；关联条款；基本子女抚养义务
Baranek v. Baranek, 54 A.D.3d 789 (2d Dep't 2008): unenforceability; omitted CSSA recitals; vacatur of support provisionBaranek v. Baranek, 54 A.D.3d 789 (2d Dep't 2008)：不可执行；遗漏CSSA陈述；撤销抚养费条款
Rockitter v. Rockitter, 113 A.D.3d 745 (2d Dep't 2014): CSSA recitals; deviation from guidelines; reasons for deviationRockitter v. Rockitter, 113 A.D.3d 745 (2d Dep't 2014)：CSSA陈述；偏离指导标准；偏离理由
Bast v. Rossoff, 91 N.Y.2d 723 (1998): custodial parent; noncustodial parent; majority of residential timeBast v. Rossoff, 91 N.Y.2d 723 (1998)：监护方父母；非监护方父母；多数居住时间
IVDisposition结果
The amended stipulation of settlement was filed on October 2, 2024, and the Judgment of Divorce incorporating it was entered on October 17, 2024.修订后的和解协议于2024年10月2日提交法院，纳入该协议的离婚判决于2024年10月17日登录。
Client details are withheld to protect confidentiality. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.为保护客户隐私，相关信息已隐去。过往结果不保证类似案件的结果。