XU LAW OFFICES P.C. 徐力(衡成)律师事务所 Attorneys At Law

FIRM CASES律所案例

Firm Update No. 2021-03本所动态 2021-03 号

In re Gas Utility Collection Suit Against a Property Owner: Discontinued Eight Days After the Firm Appeared燃气公司向业主追讨欠费诉讼:本所出庭八天后原告撤诉

Practice领域
Civil Litigation民事诉讼
Jurisdiction管辖
Supreme Court, Kings County纽约州最高法院布鲁克林区分院
Our role本所角色
Counsel to the defendant被告律师
Status进展
Discontinued by plaintiff, Aug. 20212021年8月原告撤诉

IFacts事实

The client, a property owner, was sued by a gas utility for an unpaid account at the client's building. The firm was retained on August 5, 2021, gathered the client's leases and meter information, and served a notice of appearance the next day.客户是一名业主,因其楼宇的欠费账户被燃气公司起诉。本所于2021年8月5日受聘,收集了客户的租约及电表资料,并于次日送达出庭通知。

IIQuestion Presented争议问题

What should a defendant do first when served with a utility collection suit, and how can a quick, documented response end it?收到公用事业讨债诉讼时,被告首先应做什么?迅速且有证据支持的回应如何能终结诉讼?

IIIRelevant Law相关法律

CPLR 320(a): appearance; notice of appearance; time to answer; defaultCPLR 320(a):应诉;应诉通知;答辩期限;缺席

CPLR 3217(a)(1): voluntary discontinuance; notice of discontinuance; before responsive pleadingCPLR 3217(a)(1):自愿撤诉;撤诉通知;答辩前

IVDisposition结果

On August 13, 2021, eight days after the firm was retained, plaintiff’s counsel served a notice of discontinuance. The client made no payment.2021年8月13日,即本所受聘八天后,原告律师送达撤诉通知。客户未支付任何款项。

Client details are withheld to protect confidentiality. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.为保护客户隐私,相关信息已隐去。过往结果不保证类似案件的结果。

Call Us致电我们