XU LAW OFFICES P.C. 徐力(衡成)律师事务所 Attorneys At Law

FIRM CASES律所案例

Firm Update No. 2025-07本所动态 2025-07 号

Spousal Green Card Approved at the Interview Despite Three Decades of Conflicting Records三十年记录相互矛盾,配偶绿卡仍于面谈当场获批

Practice领域
Immigration移民法
Jurisdiction管辖
USCIS, Queens Field Office美国移民局皇后区办公室
Our role本所角色
Counsel to the petitioner and the applicant申请人及受益人律师
Status进展
Approved at interview June 13, 2025; green card issued the same month2025年6月13日面谈当场批准;同月取得绿卡

IFacts事实

The client had come to the United States lawfully on a visitor visa more than thirty years earlier. Over the following decades her immigration file accumulated serious problems: an old asylum application whose account of her nationality, birthplace and arrival conflicted with her passports and entry record, work permits issued under that application, more than one passport, and other inconsistent filings. The asylum case had been closed long ago without a decision. She later married a U.S. citizen, who petitioned for her.当事人三十多年前持旅游签证合法入境。此后数十年间,她的移民档案积累了严重问题:一份早年的庇护申请,其中关于国籍、出生地及入境情况的陈述与其护照及入境记录相互矛盾;依该申请签发的工作许可;不止一本护照;以及其他相互不一致的申请。该庇护案多年前已未经裁决结案。她后来与一名美国公民结婚,由丈夫为其提出申请。

IIFilings, Hearings and Decisions程序经过

Filing (November 2024). The firm filed the spousal petition and the application to adjust status together, with the affidavit of support, a work permit application, and the client's prior passports, entry record and earlier immigration documents.递交申请(2024年11月)。本所同时递交配偶移民申请及调整身份申请,附经济担保书、工作许可申请,以及当事人以往的护照、入境记录和早年移民文件。

Interview (June 13, 2025). The couple attended the adjustment interview at the Queens field office about six and a half months after filing. No request for evidence or notice of intent to deny was issued before the interview.面谈(2025年6月13日)。递交约六个半月后,夫妻二人在皇后区办公室参加调整身份面谈。面谈前移民局未发出补件通知或拟拒绝通知。

Decision (June 13, 2025). USCIS approved the petition and the adjustment application the same day. Because the marriage was less than two years old, she became a conditional permanent resident, and the card arrived later that month.决定(2025年6月13日)。移民局当日批准亲属申请及调整身份申请。由于婚姻未满两年,她成为有条件永久居民,绿卡于当月寄达。

IIIQuestions Presented争议问题

(1) Eligibility to adjust status after a lawful admission decades earlier. (2) The immediate-relative exemption from the bars for status violations. (3) Inadmissibility for misrepresentation in prior filings, and the waiver available to the spouse of a U.S. citizen. (4) Consistency of identity, nationality and entry evidence across a long immigration record. (5) Conditional residence for a marriage of less than two years.(1)数十年前合法入境后的调整身份资格。(2)直系亲属对违反身份限制的豁免。(3)以往申请中虚假陈述导致的不可入境,以及美国公民配偶可申请的豁免。(4)漫长移民记录中身份、国籍及入境证据的一致性。(5)婚姻未满两年的有条件居留。

IVRelevant Law相关法律

INA § 201(b)(2)(A)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1151(b): immediate relative; spouse of a U.S. citizen; exemption from numerical limitsINA § 201(b)(2)(A)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1151(b):直系亲属;美国公民配偶;不受名额限制

INA § 245(a), (c), 8 U.S.C. § 1255: adjustment of status; inspection and admission; immediate-relative exception; unauthorized employment; status violationsINA § 245(a), (c), 8 U.S.C. § 1255:调整身份;经检查准许入境;直系亲属例外;非法工作;违反身份

INA § 212(a)(6)(C)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(i): willful misrepresentation; materiality; permanent inadmissibilityINA § 212(a)(6)(C)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(i):故意虚假陈述;重要性;终身不可入境

INA § 212(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i): fraud waiver; extreme hardship; qualifying relativeINA § 212(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i):欺诈豁免;极端困难;合格亲属

INA § 216, 8 U.S.C. § 1186a: conditional permanent residence; two-year marriage rule; removal of conditionsINA § 216, 8 U.S.C. § 1186a:有条件永久居留;两年婚姻规则;解除条件

VDisposition结果

Approved at the interview on June 13, 2025, about six and a half months after filing, with no request for evidence; the green card was issued the same month.递交约六个半月后,于2025年6月13日面谈当场获批,期间未收到补件通知;绿卡于同月签发。

Client details are withheld to protect confidentiality. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.为保护客户隐私,相关信息已隐去。过往结果不保证类似案件的结果。

Call Us致电我们